HomeRoast Digest


Topic: OT: Oops on message to entire list in reference to an On Topic (32 lines)
1) From: JanoMac
Folks,
The ON Topic Part was:
Essentially asking Tom to relax about his so-called shortcomings with
respect to attending the SCAA convention.
'Nuff said there.
The OFF Topic part has to do with readability.
I thought I was responding to one individual, but must have not
double-checked the  box for addresses. I apologize.
My original post was apparently interpreted by some folks' e-mail readers a=
s
tiny text. I am sitting here looking at a perfectly comfortably-sized
³medium² typeface (ostensibly 10-point) generated in Microsoft Entourage on
my Mac laptop screen at a resolution of 1151x768. I have ³aging² eyes and
use trifocals (OK, actually progressive lenses) and believe me, if it were =
8
or 9 point, I¹d find it difficult to read, too.
I have posted in the past ‹ just as I am now ‹ and no one has called in
about the type size before this. What has changed? I do not know. Same
application, same typeface, same list-server, etc.
My apologies. Lessons learned about address checking.
Kirk


HomeRoast Digest