Coffee -- Kenya Thika Gethumbwini Peaberry, 5-6 days rest, roasted to FC
Brewers -- Espresso (Spaz Vivaldi II), Vac pot, French Press, AeroPress
I chose to do this as a heads up match between two sets of two brewers,
Final Four style. I matched them up to compare what I thought would be
dissimilar brews. So the espresso went up against the vac pot, and the FP
vs. the AP.
Round 1, Saturday -- Espresso vs. Vac Pot
Saturday I did the first round, and pulled a regular double shot (15 grams)
in 24 seconds, topped off to 7oz with hot water. I wanted to taste the
Americano against the Vac pot, as I thought that I wouldn't be able to
adequately compare straight espresso to the vac pot brew.
The vac pot was made in a Hario Deco, with the paper filter (still waiting
for my glass rods to arrive). The load was 40g of beans, ground a bit
coarser than drip in a Zass, for 5 "cups" (20 oz.), with the water up north
for 1:15 before being allowed to traverse back down.
The vac pot has quite a bit of acidity, and is somewhat citrusy, which first
hits the palate, but has berry components to it, too. The body is medium.
The Americano actually has more acidity on the tongue, but the high citrusy
notes are much more muted. The body is a bit more full than the Vac Pot,
but not as much as I may have expected. Many of the flavors of the Vac Pot
are there, they've just been blunted.
Overall, I prefer the Vac Pot to the Americano.
Round 2, Sunday -- French Press vs. Aeropress
The FP was ground a little finer than the vac pot, but still coarser than
drip. A four cup (16 oz.) pot was made with 32 grams of beans. The water
was boiling when added, and it was pressed at 3:00.
The AP was made with 2 AP scoops, off-boiling water, and was pressed for 25
seconds. I topped that up to about 7 oz., to make an AP Americano.
The FP cup is fairly bright, but with some darker, leathery overtones on the
finish, which lasts quite a long time. The fruit isn't quite as aggressive,
but it's still definitely present. The AP cup has a little of that acidity,
but mostly the mid-to-low flavors of leather and a bit of unsweetened
chocolate are present. I can still detect some of the berry, but mostly
because I'm looking for it. The body is a bit heavier in the AP, I think,
but not ridiculously so. The AP cup has a much longer aftertaste. Neither
cup is nearly as "clean" tasting as the vac pot, but I think I'd have to
give the edge to the AP. It's clean, but not that bright (kinda like me
when I get out of the shower).
Of these, I prefer the AP. With this coffee. This morning. I think that
even with the same coffee, some mornings I might prefer the press. It just
depends on what part you want to highlight, I suppose.
So, the vac pot and AP were the winners, and they should probably square off
against one another. I think I'll have to roast some more first, though.
I'm not particularly surprised by any of my findings. The differences in
the vac and espresso/Americano were quite pronounced, while between the FP
and AP they were more subtle (but still quite noticeable). For this coffee,
I thought that vac pot did it the most justice, allowing me to actually
taste many of the flavor components that Tom noted in his review.
I very much enjoyed this coffee in all of its preparations, and will have to
order some of the new lot. It's a good balance of acidity and deeper notes
that I enjoy, and makes a surprisingly good SO shot. But I'd like to try
this with a coffee I prefer as espresso, like the India MNEB. Maybe next
Homeroast mailing list
Homeroasthttp://www.homeroasting.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemIdx20">http://lists.sweetmariascoffee.com/listinfo.cgi/homeroast-sweetmariascoffee.comHomeroast community pictures 9upload yours!) :http://www.homeroasting.com/gallery/main.php?g2_itemIdx20